Consensus on the Definition of Control and Remission in Chronic Urticaria.

The terms control and remission and other key terms used in chronic urticaria (CU) such as flare-up, relapse, exacerbation, and recurrence have not been fully defined in the literature. Disease monitoring and treatment goals in clinical practice are not well established. After a qualitative appraisal of available evidence, we aimed to find a consensus definition of control and remission, clarify key terminology, provide guidance on how to monitor the disease, and establish treatment goals in clinical practice. A modified Delphi consensus approach was used. Based on a literature review, a scientific committee provided 137 statements addressing controversial definitions and terms, available patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and recommendations on how to measure therapeutic objectives in CU. The questionnaire was evaluated by 138 expert allergists and dermatologists. A consensus was reached on 105 out of the 137 proposed items (76.6%). The experts agreed that complete control and remission of CU could be defined as the absence of signs or symptoms while on treatment and in the absence of treatment, respectively. Consensus was not reached on the definition of other key terms such as flare-up, exacerbation, and recurrence. The panel agreed that the objective of therapy in CU should be to achieve complete control. PROs that define the degree of control (complete, good, partial, or absence) were established. An algorithm for disease assessment is provided. In conclusion, this work offers consensus definitions and tools that may be useful in the management of patients with CU.

Daily Clinical Practice in the Management of Chronic Urticaria in Spain: Results of the UCREX Study. / [Artículo traducido] Práctica clínica diaria en el manejo de la urticaria crónica en España: resultados del estudio UCREX.

BACKGROUND: Chronic Urticaria (CU) is a debilitating disease whose treatment is mainly symptomatic. UCREX study aimed to identify CU patients' profile, disease management and quality-of-life (QoL) in daily clinical practice in Spain. METHODS: Observational, 12-months prospective, multicenter study, included de novo or established CU patients attending to dermatology/allergy consultations in 39 Spanish hospitals. MAIN VARIABLES: Urticaria Activity Score (UAS), UAS over 7 days (UAS7). Secondary variables: CU-QoL Questionnaire (CU-Q2oL), EuroQol-5 dimensions (EQ-5D), Medical Outcomes Study Sleep (MOS-Sleep) scale, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). RESULTS: 361 patients included. Of them, 176 (48.8%) considered for the main objective analysis. Mean age (SD) of 46.6 (14.2) years and 71.8% women. The year prior to inclusion, most patients (57.1%) were treated with non-sedating H1-antihistamines (NS-H1AH). At baseline, mean (SD) 3.6 (6.8) visits were registered to primary care. Mean (SD) UAS7 at baseline was 14.3 (11.0) and CU-Q2oL 24.1 (17.0) which tended to improve by 8.6 (9.7) and 13.9 (15.0), respectively, at 12-months. MOS-Sleep and EQ-5D remained steady during the study, except pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression which went from 58.7% and 49.6% to 29.6% and 26.9%, respectively. At baseline, HADS showed a mean (SD) anxiety of 8.7 (4.5) and depression 5.1 (4.4), decreasing to 7.0 (4.3) and 4.7 (4.3), respectively, at 12-months. CONCLUSIONS: Although most CU patients are treated with NS-H1AH, disease activity is still important, negatively affecting patients' QoL, work activity and healthcare resources use. An appropriate disease management could be the basis for symptoms control, QoL improvement and resources optimization.

Daily Clinical Practice in the Management of Chronic Urticaria in Spain: Results of the UCREX Study.

BACKGROUND: Chronic Urticaria (CU) is a debilitating disease whose treatment is mainly symptomatic. UCREX study aimed to identify CU patients' profile, disease management and quality-of-life (QoL) in daily clinical practice in Spain. METHODS: Observational, 12-months prospective, multicenter study, included de novo or established CU patients attending to dermatology/allergy consultations in 39 Spanish hospitals. MAIN VARIABLES: Urticaria Activity Score (UAS), UAS over 7 days (UAS7). Secondary variables: CU-QoL Questionnaire (CU-Q2oL), EuroQol-5 dimensions (EQ-5D), Medical Outcomes Study Sleep (MOS-Sleep) scale, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). RESULTS: 361 patients included. Of them, 176 (48.8%) considered for the main objective analysis. Mean age (SD) of 46.6 (14.2) years and 71.8% women. The year prior to inclusion, most patients (57.1%) were treated with non-sedating H1-antihistamines (NS-H1AH). At baseline, mean (SD) 3.6 (6.8) visits were registered to primary care. Mean (SD) UAS7 at baseline was 14.3 (11.0) and CU-Q2oL 24.1 (17.0) which tended to improve by 8.6 (9.7) and 13.9 (15.0), respectively, at 12-months. MOS-Sleep and EQ-5D remained steady during the study, except pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression which went from 58.7% and 49.6% to 29.6% and 26.9%, respectively. At baseline, HADS showed a mean (SD) anxiety of 8.7 (4.5) and depression 5.1 (4.4), decreasing to 7.0 (4.3) and 4.7 (4.3), respectively, at 12-months. CONCLUSIONS: Although most CU patients are treated with NS-H1AH, disease activity is still important, negatively affecting patients' QoL, work activity and healthcare resources use. An appropriate disease management could be the basis for symptoms control, QoL improvement and resources optimization.

Molecular Allergy Diagnosis in Clinical Practice: Frequently Asked Questions.

Considerable progress has been made in the field of molecular biology in recent years, enabling the study of sensitization to the individual components of an allergenic source, a practice that has been termed molecular allergy diagnosis (MD) or component-resolved diagnosis (CRD). The present review provides the clinician with a practical approach to the use of MD by answering questions frequently asked by physicians on how MD can help improve the diagnosis of allergy in daily clinical practice. The article is divided into 3 sections. First, we provide a brief review of the importance for the clinician of knowing the main allergens in the different allergenic sources, their structure, and their in vitro cross-reactivity before approaching MD (section A). Second, we review the usefulness of MD in clinical practice (section B) and answer frequently asked questions on the subject. Finally, section C addresses the interpretation of MD and its integration with other tools available for the diagnosis of allergy.

Daily Clinical Practice in the Management of Chronic Urticaria in Spain: Results of the UCREX Study / Práctica clínica diaria en el manejo de la urticaria crónica en España: resultados del estudio UCREX

Background: Chronic Urticaria (CU) is a debilitating disease whose treatment is mainly symptomatic. UCREX study aimed to identify CU patients’ profile, disease management and quality-of-life (QoL) in daily clinical practice in Spain. Methods: Observational, 12-months prospective, multicenter study, included de novo or established CU patients attending to dermatology/allergy consultations in 39 Spanish hospitals. Main variables: Urticaria Activity Score (UAS), UAS over 7 days (UAS7). Secondary variables: CU-QoL Questionnaire (CU-Q2oL), EuroQol-5 dimensions (EQ-5D), Medical Outcomes Study Sleep (MOS-Sleep) scale, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Results: 361 patients included. Of them, 176 (48.8%) considered for the main objective analysis. Mean age (SD) of 46.6 (14.2) years and 71.8% women. The year prior to inclusion, most patients (57.1%) were treated with non-sedating H1-antihistamines (NS-H1AH). At baseline, mean (SD) 3.6 (6.8) visits were registered to primary care. Mean (SD) UAS7 at baseline was 14.3 (11.0) and CU-Q2oL 24.1 (17.0) which tended to improve by 8.6 (9.7) and 13.9 (15.0), respectively, at 12-months. MOS-Sleep and EQ-5D remained steady during the study, except pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression which went from 58.7% and 49.6% to 29.6% and 26.9%, respectively. At baseline, HADS showed a mean (SD) anxiety of 8.7 (4.5) and depression 5.1 (4.4), decreasing to 7.0 (4.3) and 4.7 (4.3), respectively, at 12-months. Conclusions: Although most CU patients are treated with NS-H1AH, disease activity is still important, negatively affecting patients’ QoL, work activity and healthcare resources use. An appropriate disease management could be the basis for symptoms control, QoL improvement and resources optimization

Antecedentes: La urticaria crónica (UC) es una enfermedad debilitante cuyo tratamiento es principalmente sintomático. El estudio UCREX tuvo como objetivo identificar el perfil de los pacientes con UC, el manejo de la enfermedad y la calidad de vida (CdV) en la práctica clínica diaria en España. Métodos: Estudio observacional, prospectivo, multicéntrico de 12 meses, que incluyó pacientes con UC de novo o establecida que acudieron a la consulta de dermatología/alergología de 39 hospitales españoles. Las variables principales fueron: el Urticaria Activity Score (UAS) y el UAS por siete días (UAS7). Las variables secundarias fueron: el cuestionario de CdV de urticaria crónica (CU-Q2oL), el EuroQol-5 Dimensiones (EQ-5D), la escala Medical Outcomes Study Sleep (MOS-Sleep) y la escala hospitalaria de ansiedad y depresión (HADS). Resultados: Se incluyeron 361 pacientes, de los cuales 176 (48,8%) formaron parte del análisis del objetivo principal. La edad media (DE) fue de 46,6 (14,2) años y el 71,8% eran del sexo femenino. El año anterior al periodo de inclusión de los pacientes, la mayoría de ellos (57,1%) se habían tratado con antihistamínicos H1 no sedantes (AHNS-H1). En la basal, se registró una media (DE) de 3,6 (6,8) de visitas a atención primaria. La media (DE) del UAS7 en la basal fue de 14,3 (11,0) y del CU-Q2oL 24,1 (17,0), observándose una tendencia en la mejoría en 8,6 (9,7) y 13,9 (15,0), respectivamente, a los 12 meses. El MOS-Sleep y el EQ-5D se mantuvieron estables durante el estudio, excepto por el dolor/malestar y la ansiedad/depresión que pasaron de 58,7 y 49,6% a 29,6 y 26,9%, respectivamente. En situación basal, el HADS mostró una ansiedad media (DE) de 8,7 (4,5) y una depresión de 5,1 (4,4), disminuyendo respectivamente a 7,0 (4,3) y 4,7 (4,3) a los 12 meses. Conclusiones: Aunque la mayoría de los pacientes son tratados con AHNS-H1, la actividad de la enfermedad sigue siendo importante, afectando negativamente a su CdV (AU)

[Artículo traducido] Práctica clínica diaria en el manejo de la urticaria crónica en España: resultados del estudio UCREX / Daily Clinical Practice in the Management of Chronic Urticaria in Spain: Results of the UCREX Study

Antecedentes: La urticaria crónica (UC) es una enfermedad debilitante cuyo tratamiento es principalmente sintomático. El estudio UCREX tuvo como objetivo identificar el perfil de los pacientes con UC, el manejo de la enfermedad y la calidad de vida (CdV) en la práctica clínica diaria en España. Métodos: Estudio observacional, prospectivo, multicéntrico de 12 meses, que incluyó pacientes con UC de novo o establecida que acudieron a la consulta de dermatología/alergología de 39 hospitales españoles. Las variables principales fueron: el Urticaria Activity Score (UAS) y el UAS por siete días (UAS7). Las variables secundarias fueron: el cuestionario de CdV de urticaria crónica (CU-Q2oL), el EuroQol-5 Dimensiones (EQ-5D), la escala Medical Outcomes Study Sleep (MOS-Sleep) y la escala hospitalaria de ansiedad y depresión (HADS). Resultados: Se incluyeron 361 pacientes, de los cuales 176 (48,8%) formaron parte del análisis del objetivo principal. La edad media (DE) fue de 46,6 (14,2) años y el 71,8% eran del sexo femenino. El año anterior al periodo de inclusión de los pacientes, la mayoría de ellos (57,1%) se habían tratado con antihistamínicos H1 no sedantes (AHNS-H1). En la basal, se registró una media (DE) de 3,6 (6,8) de visitas a atención primaria. La media (DE) del UAS7 en la basal fue de 14,3 (11,0) y del CU-Q2oL 24,1 (17,0), observándose una tendencia en la mejoría en 8,6 (9,7) y 13,9 (15,0), respectivamente, a los 12 meses. El MOS-Sleep y el EQ-5D se mantuvieron estables durante el estudio, excepto por el dolor/malestar y la ansiedad/depresión que pasaron de 58,7 y 49,6% a 29,6 y 26,9%, respectivamente. En situación basal, el HADS mostró una ansiedad media (DE) de 8,7 (4,5) y una depresión de 5,1 (4,4), disminuyendo respectivamente a 7,0 (4,3) y 4,7 (4,3) a los 12 meses. Conclusiones: Aunque la mayoría de los pacientes son tratados con AHNS-H1 (AU)

Background: Chronic Urticaria (CU) is a debilitating disease whose treatment is mainly symptomatic. UCREX study aimed to identify CU patients’ profile, disease management and quality-of-life (QoL) in daily clinical practice in Spain. Methods: Observational, 12-months prospective, multicenter study, included de novo or established CU patients attending to dermatology/allergy consultations in 39 Spanish hospitals. Main variables: Urticaria Activity Score (UAS), UAS over 7 days (UAS7). Secondary variables: CU-QoL Questionnaire (CU-Q2oL), EuroQol-5 dimensions (EQ-5D), Medical Outcomes Study Sleep (MOS-Sleep) scale, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Results: 361 patients included. Of them, 176 (48.8%) considered for the main objective analysis. Mean age (SD) of 46.6 (14.2) years and 71.8% women. The year prior to inclusion, most patients (57.1%) were treated with non-sedating H1-antihistamines (NS-H1AH). At baseline, mean (SD) 3.6 (6.8) visits were registered to primary care. Mean (SD) UAS7 at baseline was 14.3 (11.0) and CU-Q2oL 24.1 (17.0) which tended to improve by 8.6 (9.7) and 13.9 (15.0), respectively, at 12-months. MOS-Sleep and EQ-5D remained steady during the study, except pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression which went from 58.7% and 49.6% to 29.6% and 26.9%, respectively. At baseline, HADS showed a mean (SD) anxiety of 8.7 (4.5) and depression 5.1 (4.4), decreasing to 7.0 (4.3) and 4.7 (4.3), respectively, at 12-months. Conclusions: Although most CU patients are treated with NS-H1AH, disease activity is still important, negatively affecting patients’ QoL, work activity and healthcare resources use. An appropriate disease management could be the basis for symptoms control, QoL improvement and resources optimization

Onset of Nut Allergy in a Pediatric Cohort: Clinical and Molecular Patterns in the AFRUSEN Study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Nut allergy is a growing problem, yet little is known about its onset in children. Objective: To characterize the onset of nut allergy in children in southern Europe. METHODS: The study population comprised consecutive patients up to 14 years of age who visited allergy departments with an initial allergic reaction to peanut, tree nut, or seed. The allergy work-up included a clinical history, food challenge, skin prick testing, determination of whole-extract sIgE, and ImmunoCAP ISAC-112 assay. RESULTS: Of the 271 children included, 260 were first diagnosed with nut allergy at a mean age of 6.5 years and at a mean (SD) of 11.8 (21.2) months after the index reaction. The most common culprit nuts at onset were walnut (36.5%), peanut (28.5%), cashew (10.4%), hazelnut (8.5%), pistachio (5.4%), and almond (5%). Onset of peanut allergy was more frequent in children ≤6 years and walnut in those aged >6 years (P=.032). In 65% of cases, the allergic reaction occurred the first time the patient consumed the nut, and 35% of reactions were anaphylactic. Overall, polysensitization to nuts was detected by skin prick testing in 64.9% of patients, although this rate was lower among walnut-allergic children (54.7%) and peanut-allergic children (54.1%) (P<.0001). Sensitization to 2S albumins was predominant (75%), especially Jug r 1 (52.8%), whereas sensitization to lipid transfer proteins was less relevant (37%). CONCLUSION: In the population we assessed, the onset of nut allergy occurred around 6 years of age, slightly later than that reported in English-speaking countries. Walnut was the main trigger, followed by peanut. 2S albumin storage proteins, especially Jug r 1, were the most relevant allergens. This study will help guide management and may contribute to preventive strategies in pediatric nut allergy.

Consensus on the Definition of Control and Remission in Chronic Urticaria

The terms control and remission and other key terms used in chronic urticaria (CU) such as flare-up, relapse, exacerbation, and recurrence have not been fully defined in the literature. Disease monitoring and treatment goals in clinical practice are not well established. After a qualitative appraisal of available evidence, we aimed to find a consensus definition of control and remission, clarify key terminology, provide guidance on how to monitor the disease, and establish treatment goals in clinical practice. A modified Delphi consensus approach was used. Based on a literature review, a scientific committee provided 137 statements addressing controversial definitions and terms, available patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and recommendations on how to measure therapeutic objectives in CU. The questionnaire was evaluated by 138 expert allergists and dermatologists. A consensus was reached on 105 out of the 137 proposed items (76.6%). The experts agreed that complete control and remission of CU could be defined as the absence of signs or symptoms while on treatment and in the absence of treatment, respectively. Consensus was not reached on the definition of other key terms such as flare-up, exacerbation, and recurrence. The panel agreed that the objective of therapy in CU should be to achieve complete control. PROs that define the degree of control (complete, good, partial, or absence) were established. An algorithm for disease assessment is provided. In conclusion, this work offers consensus definitions and tools that may be useful in the management of patients with CU (AU)

El concepto de control y remisión de la enfermedad, así como otros términos clave utilizados en la urticaria crónica (UC), como reagudización, recaída, exacerbación o recurrencia, no están totalmente aclarados en la literatura. Tampoco está bien establecido el seguimiento de la enfermedad y los objetivos del tratamiento en la práctica clínica. Tras una evaluación cualitativa de la evidencia, nos propusimos encontrar una definición consensuada de control y remisión de la UC, aclarar terminología clave, proporcionar orientación sobre cómo monitorizar la enfermedad y establecer objetivos de tratamiento en la práctica clínica. Para llegar a un consenso, se utilizó una técnica Delphi modificada. Basándose en una revisión de la literatura, un comité científico elaboró 137 aseveraciones que abordaban definiciones y términos controvertidos, el uso de Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) y recomendaciones sobre cómo medir los objetivos terapéuticos en la UC. El cuestionario fue evaluado por 138 alergólogos y dermatólogos expertos. Se alcanzó un consenso en 105 de las 137 aseveraciones propuestas (76,6%). Los expertos estuvieron de acuerdo en que el control completo y la remisión de la CU podrían definirse como la ausencia de signos o síntomas de la enfermedad mientras se está en tratamiento y en ausencia de tratamiento, respectivamente. No se alcanzó un consenso sobre la definición de otros términos clave como reagudización, exacerbación o recurrencia. El panel estuvo de acuerdo en que el objetivo terapéutico de la CU debe ser lograr un control completo. Se establecieron los PROs que definen el grado de control de la CU (completo, bueno, parcial o ausencia de control). Además, se creó un algoritmo para la evaluación de la enfermedad. En conclusión, este trabajo ofrece definiciones y herramientas de consenso que pueden ser útiles en el manejo de los pacientes con CU (AU)

Molecular Allergy Diagnosis in Clinical Practice: Frequently Asked Questions

Considerable progress has been made in the field of molecular biology in recent years, enabling the study of sensitization to the individualcomponents of an allergenic source, a practice that has been termed molecular allergy diagnosis (MD) or component-resolved diagnosis (CRD).The present review provides the clinician with a practical approach to the use of MD by answering questions frequently asked by physicianson how MD can help improve the diagnosis of allergy in daily clinical practice.The article is divided into 3 sections. First, we provide a brief review of the importance for the clinician of knowing the main allergens inthe different allergenic sources, their structure, and their in vitro cross-reactivity before approaching MD (section A). Second, we reviewthe usefulness of MD in clinical practice (section B) and answer frequently asked questions on the subject. Finally, section C addresses theinterpretation of MD and its integration with other tools available for the diagnosis of allergy (AU)

En las últimas décadas ha habido un gran avance en el campo de la biología molecular permitiendo el estudio de la sensibilización acomponentes alergénicos individuales de una fuente alergénica. Dicha práctica se ha denominado Diagnóstico Molecular en alergia (DM)o Diagnóstico por Resolución de Componentes (CRD, según las iniciales en inglés).El propósito de la presente revisión es ofrecer al clínico un enfoque práctico para el uso del DM respondiendo preguntas frecuentes entrelos médicos sobre cómo puede ayudarnos a mejorar el diagnóstico de alergia en nuestra práctica clínica diaria.La revisión se divide en tres secciones. En primer lugar, se realiza una breve revisión sobre la importancia que tiene para el clínico conocerlos principales alérgenos de las diferentes fuentes alergénicas, su estructura y su reactividad cruzada in vitro antes de abordar el DM(apartado A). En segundo lugar, está el núcleo de la revisión sobre la utilidad del DM en la práctica clínica (apartado B) respondiendo alas preguntas frecuentes sobre el tema, y, finalmente, se añade un apartado (C) sobre la interpretación e integración del DM con el restode las herramientas disponibles para el diagnóstico de alergia (AU)

Clinical Approach to Mast Cell Activation Syndrome: A Practical Overview.

The diagnosis of mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS) is defined by 3 criteria: (1) typical clinical signs and symptoms of acute, recurrent (episodic), and systemic mast cell activation (MCA); (2) increase in tryptase level to >20% + 2 ng/mL within 1-4 hours after onset of the acute crisis; and (3) response of MCA symptoms to antimediator therapy. Classification of MCAS requires highly sensitive and specific methodological approaches for the assessment of clonal bone marrow mast cells at low frequencies. The Spanish Network on Mastocytosis score has been used successfully as a predictive model for selecting MCAS candidates for bone marrow studies based on a high probability of an underlying clonal mast cell disorder. In this article, we propose a diagnostic algorithm and focus on the practical evaluation and management of patients with suspected MCAS.

Clinical Approach to Mast Cell ActivationSyndrome: A Practical Overview

The diagnosis of mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS) is defined by 3 criteria: (1) typical clinical signs and symptoms of acute, recurrent (episodic), and systemic mast cell activation (MCA); (2) increase in tryptase level to >20% + 2 ng/mL within 1-4 hours after onset of the acute crisis; and (3) response of MCA symptoms to antimediator therapy. Classification of MCAS requires highly sensitive and specific methodological approaches for the assessment of clonal bone marrow mast cells at low frequencies. The Spanish Network on Mastocytosis score has been used successfully as a predictive model for selecting MCAS candidates for bone marrow studies based on a high probability of an underlying clonal mast cell disorder. In this article, we propose a diagnostic algorithm and focus on the practical evaluation and management of patients with suspected MCAS (AU)

El diagnóstico de síndrome de activación mastocitaria (SAM) se basa en 3 criterios: 1) signos y síntomas específicos de activación mastocitaria aguda, recurrente y sistémica, 2) aumento de los valores de triptasa en un 20% + 2 ng/ml sobre el valor basal de cada individuo en el periodo comprendido entre 1-4 horas desde el inicio del cuadro agudo, y 3) resolución de los síntomas con tratamiento antimediador. Para realizar el diagnóstico de SAM, es preciso emplear métodos diagnósticos altamente sensibles y específicos capaces de detectar bajas cantidades de mastocitos en la médula ósea. El modelo predictivo de la Red Española de Mastocitosis (REMA score) resulta útil para identificar a los pacientes con mayor probabilidad de padecer una patología mastocitaria clonal y que, por tanto, requieren que se nealice un estudio de médula ósea en el proceso diagnóstico. En este artículo, proponemos un algoritmo diagnóstico para SAM y abordamos el manejo de estos pacientes desde un punto de vista práctico en la consulta alergológica (AU)

Successful adaptation of bee venom ommunotherapy in a patient monosensitized to api m 10

No disponible

Therapeutic Strategy According to Differences in Response to Omalizumab in Patients With Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria.

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is a heterogeneous condition that can severely impact quality of life. Consequently, rapid disease control is essential. First-line treatment of the symptoms of CSU is the licensed dose of second-generation H1 antihistamines. For second-line treatment, this dose may be increased by up to 4 times. In patients who fail to respond to higher doses of H1 antihistamines, omalizumab for up to 24 weeks is recommended to achieve disease control. After this 24-week period, the patient's response to omalizumab should be assessed in order to identify refractory patients. Optimal management of refractory patients has not been established. Therefore, the aim of the present consensus document, which was drafted by allergists and dermatologists with specific expertise in treating urticaria, was to define specific patient profiles based on differences in their response to omalizumab. We also developed a treatment algorithm based on the specific response profile. After a comprehensive literature review, a group meeting was held to discuss issues related to the therapeutic management of patients with CSU that had not been addressed in previous studies. The experts considered both the available evidence and their own clinical experience with omalizumab. We believe that implementation of the proposed algorithm will optimize management of CSU patients who are refractory to antihistamines, reduce disease-related costs, and improve quality of life.

Therapeutic strategy according to differences in response to omalizumab in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is a heterogeneous condition that can severely impact quality of life. Consequently, rapid disease control is essential. First-line treatment of the symptoms of CSU is the licensed dose of second-generation H1 antihistamines. For second-line treatment, this dose may be increased by up to 4 times. In patients who fail to respond to higher doses of H1 antihistamines, omalizumab for up to 24 weeks is recommended to achieve disease control. After this 24-week period, the patient's response to omalizumab should be assessed in order to identify refractory patients. Optimal management of refractory patients has not been established. Therefore, the aim of the present consensus document, which was drafted by allergists and dermatologists with specific expertise in treating urticaria, was to define specific patient profiles based on differences in their response to omalizumab. We also developed a treatment algorithm based on the specific response profile. After a comprehensive literature review, a group meeting was held to discuss issues related to the therapeutic management of patients with CSU that had not been addressed in previous studies. The experts considered both the available evidence and their own clinical experience with omalizumab. We believe that implementation of the proposed algorithm will optimize management of CSU patients who are refractory to antihistamines, reduce disease-related costs, and improve quality of life

La urticaria crónica espontánea (UCE) es una afección heterogénea que puede afectar gravemente la calidad de vida, por lo que el control rápido de la enfermedad es esencial. El tratamiento sintomático de primera línea de CSU es la dosis autorizada de antihistamínicos H1 de segunda generación. Para el tratamiento de segunda línea, esta dosis se puede aumentar hasta cuatro veces. En pacientes que no responden a estas dosis más altas de antihistamínicos H1, se recomienda el tratamiento con omalizumab (hasta 24 semanas) para lograr el control de la enfermedad. Después de este período de 24 semanas, se debe definir el perfil de respuesta del paciente a omalizumab para identificar a los pacientes refractarios. El enfoque de manejo óptimo para pacientes refractarios no ha sido establecido. En este contexto, el objetivo del presente estudio de consenso de expertos que involucró a un grupo de especialistas (alergólogos y dermatólogos) con experiencia específica en el tratamiento de la urticaria fue definir perfiles de pacientes específicos en función de sus diferentes respuestas a omalizumab. Otro objetivo fue desarrollar un algoritmo de tratamiento basado en el perfil de respuesta específico. Primero, se realizó una revisión exhaustiva de la literatura. Luego, se llevó a cabo una reunión grupal para discutir todos los temas relacionados con el manejo terapéutico de estos pacientes que no se habían abordado en ningún estudio previo. En todos los casos, los expertos consideraron tanto la evidencia disponible como su propia experiencia clínica con omalizumab. Creemos que la implementación de este algoritmo propuesto ayudará a optimizar la gestión de los pacientes con CSU que son refractarios al tratamiento con antihistamínicos, reduciendo los costos relacionados con la enfermedad y mejorando la calidad de vida de los pacientes

Differences in chronic spontaneous urticaria between Europe and Central/South America: results of the multi-center real world AWARE study.

BACKGROUND: Global chronic urticaria (CU) disease experience and management is not well documented. This study descriptively compares these aspects among CU patients residing in Europe (EU) and Central and South America (C/SA). METHODS: AWARE (A World-wide Antihistamine-Refractory chronic urticaria patient Evaluation) is a global prospective, non-interventional study of CU in the real-world setting. Patients were ≥ 18 years with a diagnosis of H1-antihistamine-refractory CU for > 2 months. Differences between the EU and C/SA regions in demographic and clinical characteristics, quality of life (QoL), work and activity impairment, pharmacological treatment, and healthcare resource use were examined. RESULTS: In total, 4224 patients were included in the analysis (C/SA 492; EU 3732). Rates of untreated patients were greater in the C/SA region (45.1% vs. 31.9%; P < 0.005) and escalation to third-line therapy was rare in both regions. Differences in disease experience emerged, with C/SA patients more commonly experiencing angioedema (C/SA 50.8% vs. EU 46.1%; P = 0.03) or comorbid chronic inducible urticaria (C/SA 30% vs. EU 22%; P < 0.001). Correspondingly, rates of uncontrolled urticaria were higher among C/SA patients (82.8% vs. 77.5%; P = 0.017) and patients in the C/SA region showed significantly greater work and activity impairment (absenteeism: 10.4 ± 19.7 vs. 6.7 ± 19.0, P = 0.004; presenteeism: 30.3 ± 31.9 vs. 24.4 ± 25.8, P = 0.001; work productivity loss: 33.9 ± 33.9 vs. 26.5 ± 27.5, P < 0.001; activity impairment: 37.7 ± 34.7 vs. 32.7 ± 30.1, P = 0.001). However, QoL impairment was greater in the EU region (Dermatology Life Quality Index: C/SA 6.5 ± 5.9 vs. EU 8.3 ± 7.0; P < 0.001). There was a significant difference in use of healthcare resources, including emergency services (39.6% vs. 29.3%; P < 0.001), hospitalization (7.7% vs 21.9%; P < 0.001) general practitioners (31.7% vs 57.3%; P < 0.001), and additional allergists or dermatologists (50.6% vs. 47.3%, P < 0.001), among patients in the C/SA and EU region, respectively. In both regions, patients with a primary diagnosis of CU with angioedema had significantly greater impairment in work and non-work activities and healthcare resource utilization compared to those without angioedema. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed that CU is a heterogeneous condition with differences in healthcare utilization and outcomes between EU and C/SA. However, overall there is a high unmet need of H1-antihistamine-refractory CU patients, which is associated with high use of healthcare resources, and has a large negative effect on QoL and work productivity.